This comes weeks after British footballer Ryan Giggs attempted to similarly disclose the identities of Twitter users in the UK High Court, who had named the Welsh player linked to an affair, by disregarding a privacy injunction. It is believed that Twitter were not required to comply as the ruling was not enforceable in the US, where the social media company is based.
However, South Tyneside councillors Iain Malcolm, David Potts and Anne Walsh have reportedly managed to unmask the identity of the libellous user after applying for a court order in the US.
This case is now likely to be a landmark ruling against Twitter,with law experts suggesting that this may prompt in the future UK citizens to take action in US.
Will this be the precedent set? Will this effect Freedom of Speech? How will this impact Twitter?
0 comments:
Post a Comment